0

1

2

3

4

Total

Graphics (pictures, drawings)

No graphics

Few graphics

Some graphics but did not support the content of the slides

Graphics were appropriate and supported the message of each slide

Excellent graphics that supported the content of each slide.

  /4 

Text

Text was extremely minimal, did not convey the information necessary.

Font, style and colour of text was difficult to read and contained significant spelling errors, which detracted from the presentation.

Text was readable but minimal and contained some spelling errors, which detracted from the presentation.

Text was readable (color and font) and supported the message of the presentation.

Text font and style enhanced the presentation. No spelling errors.

/4

Special Effects (sound)

No special effects

Too many sound effects, detracted from the message of the presentation

Some sound effects were used.

Sound was used to support the message of the presentation

Sound was used to enhance, but did not detract from the message.

/4

Content

(x4)

No information

(0)

Information was incorrect and did not support the topic of the presentation (4)

Information was correct but minimal (8)

Information was satisfactory and supported the topic of the presentation (12)

Information was interesting and informative. (16)

/16

Originality

(x2)

No evidence of new thought

(0)

Minimal evidence of new thought.  The work presented is a basic summary of notes given in class.

(2)

Some evidence of originality and inventiveness.  Demonstrates a basic understanding of the content.

(4)

The product shows clear evidence of originality and inventiveness.  Demonstrates a substantial understanding of the content and extends beyond that to offer new insights and understandings. (6)

The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness.  The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions. (8)

/8

Bibliography

No bibliography

Bibliography was attempted but was incomplete or incorrect

Bibliography cited some sources.  Graphics saved from the internet were not cited.

Bibliography cited most sources and some graphics from the internet were cited.

Bibliography was complete and comprehensive.  All graphics and information sources were cited in the correct format

/4

Overall Effect

Project was not completed

Lack of effort was apparent

Effort could have been improved and computer lab time could have been used more effectively

Overall effort was satisfactory.  Satisfactory use of computer lab time.

Excellent overall effort and use of computer lab time.

/4

Group Work

No teamwork, poor classroom behaviour, failed to meet deadlines and project requirements

Poor teamwork, some misbehaviour, sometimes late for deadlines and project requirements

Some teamwork, little misbehaviour, met most deadlines and project requirements

Some teamwork, no misbehaviour, met all deadlines and project requirements.

Excellent teamwork, good behaviour, worked together to meet all deadlines and project requirements.

/4

Two (2) aspects of my work that I really did well:

Two (2) improvements that I could have made to my work: